im a R N nurse in the usa can my R n degree work in france do they accept my american R n degree?
im a R N nurse and i want to move to FRANCE does my degree work in france ? do they accept american diploma to work as nurse in france?
Immigration - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
They may accept your diploma, although a four year degree is stronger, but you may have trouble getting a work visa. Check with the French Consulate in Washington. good luck
2 :
Well last time i checked, being in the 10th grade does not qualify you as a R.N. and it is against the law to pose as one when your not!!!!!
3 :
One week ago you said you were 16 years old. Did you start college at age 10? An American BSN degree may be accepted if you can pass their license examination and speak fluent French.
Read more discussion :
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Book title. Action thriller set in middle east, has american nurse who gets killed a lover who wants revenge
Book title. Action thriller set in middle east, has american nurse who gets killed a lover who wants revenge?
Book title: Action thriller set in middle east, has american girl who gets killed by west agents in about chapter 3, a boyfriend who wants revenge, a chase throughout the mid east int france where boyfriend confronts girl killer points gun pulls trigger gun fires but the slide locks have been altered so the slide is propelled backwards into the face of boyfriend killing him. Book title: Action Thriller set mainly in the middle east, has an american girl who sees the suffering of the people and becomes involved with them. She gets killed by western agents in about chapter 3., her boyfriend wants revenge, there is a game of cat and mouse throughout the middle east then into France where boyfriend who has now become an assasin confronts girls killer. He points a gun at him pulls trigger, the gun fires but the slide locks have been altered so that the power of the exploding cartridge propells the slide backwards into the face of the assasin killing him. This book sounds like something Jack Higgins would write but i am not sure.
Books & Authors - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
This isn't easy either. That's probabaly why you're asking for help. Best bet is to keep writing and somewhere in the text may be a phrase or sentence that would suggest a title. Blowback suggests itself but that is only a minor part of the tale. Sorry can't be of anymore help without more detail. Ed.
2 :
Chasing Love
3 :
The American Nightmare Eastern Trigger French Fancy Chase of a Lifetime (Literally lol) Deadly Justice
4 :
this sounds lame but Backfire Revenge or For the Love of Guns
Read more discussion :
Book title: Action thriller set in middle east, has american girl who gets killed by west agents in about chapter 3, a boyfriend who wants revenge, a chase throughout the mid east int france where boyfriend confronts girl killer points gun pulls trigger gun fires but the slide locks have been altered so the slide is propelled backwards into the face of boyfriend killing him. Book title: Action Thriller set mainly in the middle east, has an american girl who sees the suffering of the people and becomes involved with them. She gets killed by western agents in about chapter 3., her boyfriend wants revenge, there is a game of cat and mouse throughout the middle east then into France where boyfriend who has now become an assasin confronts girls killer. He points a gun at him pulls trigger, the gun fires but the slide locks have been altered so that the power of the exploding cartridge propells the slide backwards into the face of the assasin killing him. This book sounds like something Jack Higgins would write but i am not sure.
Books & Authors - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
This isn't easy either. That's probabaly why you're asking for help. Best bet is to keep writing and somewhere in the text may be a phrase or sentence that would suggest a title. Blowback suggests itself but that is only a minor part of the tale. Sorry can't be of anymore help without more detail. Ed.
2 :
Chasing Love
3 :
The American Nightmare Eastern Trigger French Fancy Chase of a Lifetime (Literally lol) Deadly Justice
4 :
this sounds lame but Backfire Revenge or For the Love of Guns
Read more discussion :
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Please read this article that I found and argue your side. Does this guy have it right
Please read this article that I found and argue your side. Does this guy have it right?
For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to “industry†lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined “evil†as resulting from “indecision.†Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of the whole country contributes to the health of each of us, we can ask if private interests, wishing to maximize profit, should be the arbiters of the public good. They are investor-owned businesses that design health care systems that benefit their investors. From recent polls we know that two-thirds of the public would prefer a system with a public option. More than 60 percent of physicians wish for such a system. Unlike the propaganda of corporate representatives, a public option in health care would provide free choice of physicians for the patient. Lobbyists shamelessly portray the Canadian system in a negative light although I have yet to meet a Canadian who would be willing to adopt the American model. In fact, no country that has a public option would change to the American model for the simple reason that they know that a health care system based on profits would deny insurance to those who are most in need. According to the World Health Organization, the U.S. ranks low in two of three main categories associated with health care: preventive care and cost of care. It is true that in a couple of categories the U.S. excels, such as surgery and medical technology, but there are many other criteria for good health, especially in the area of preventive medicine. In France, whose general health care system is highly regarded throughout the world, providers satisfy the three categories: They provide easier access to medical facilities; life spans are longer; there is lower child mortality, and there is guaranteed health care from cradle to grave financed through tax revenues. The government’s role is to make sure that the whole population has access to care. It protects patients’ rights, helps to work out policy and is the responsible party where health safety is concerned. Despite this, it is not a single payer. America now pays out 17 percent of its gross national product on health while France, Canada and England pay less than 10 percent. The trillion-dollar additional cost that has been under discussion in Congress is based on a 10-year cycle that amounts to $200 billion per year. Compared to the trillion-dollar bailout of banking interests on Wall Street and the trillion-dollar war in Iraq and the continuing hemorrhaging of the auto industry, this is a reasonable amount. The real reason there are such vehement arguments over public options versus private plans does not involve which is superior but which approach has the most to lose. Large corporations, whether HMOs or pharmaceuticals, are intent on creating indecision and doubt in the minds of many Americans concerning universal health care. Most medical professionals, including the 3 million-member American Nursing Association and the American Medical Association, have endorsed health care plans with public options. But with all the lobbying taking place by corporate interests there is a real danger that the public option will be removed. This would be a major setback for both working and unemployed Americans. At this moment 14,000 people per day are losing their health care because of the current downturn in the economy. Democracy cannot long survive if the gaps between rich and poor continue to increase and continue shifting us toward a small wealthy minority and a disappearing middle class. Health care is the largest cause of bankruptcy among the elderly. It bleeds and depletes the resources of families even when one person suffers a serious accident or illness. Although we pay twice the amount per capita as do other developed countries, the results are that we are less healthy. Let us support a public option based on the common good. Hugh Curran of Surry is an adjunct professor in peace studies at the University of Maine. He previously was the director of a Down East homeless shelter.
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
My argument? Complete freedom of choice in health-care: Good. Socialized medicine: Bad. Bankrupt nation paying for socialized medicine: Even Worse.
2 :
You asked this question yesterday. My answer remains the same. Much of what the writer says is very true. The most important consideration ~~ at least as far as the health care providers are considered ~~ is "Profit" Health care to those who have invested in such is a "business" They don't' really care about a person's health. It's all based on who winds up with the potful of money. Read the article again. It's called 'greed'~~~ and He makes good sense.
3 :
No he doesn't...He is a Socialist Shill. A capitalist hater. Why in the world would someone invest 12 years of college to earn $80,000 a year? Also, does The O'Bama guarantee that a doctor won't get sued? Will a doctor no longer have to pay malpractice insurance? Democracy may not survive as this Educated imbecile is clamoring, But I guarantee you a Republican form of government (the form of government in the US, NOT a Democracy) HAS to have a gap between the rich and the poor or the poor will have NO incentive to better their situation. Also by removing wealth from the one who earns it and gives it to those who don't provides an incentive to do one of two things. STOP making money or go make it where it is NOT taken away from you...Since the latest tax increase in New York City, watch to see how many rich leave that mess and how many poor move in to fill the vacuum.
Read more discussion :
For-profit health care hurts those who need it most by Hugh Curran There is much debate about health care yet little consideration for the ethical implications, especially the appropriateness of profit motives in the health care industry. Americans do not seek to make a profit from education (kindergarten to grade 12), fire or police departments, yet people seriously listen to “industry†lobbyists who believe this to be a right in health care. The philosopher Martin Buber defined “evil†as resulting from “indecision.†Where health care is involved there is a good deal of indecision, but this indecision is largely the result of disinformation by those who profit from health care. If we begin with the understanding that the health of the whole country contributes to the health of each of us, we can ask if private interests, wishing to maximize profit, should be the arbiters of the public good. They are investor-owned businesses that design health care systems that benefit their investors. From recent polls we know that two-thirds of the public would prefer a system with a public option. More than 60 percent of physicians wish for such a system. Unlike the propaganda of corporate representatives, a public option in health care would provide free choice of physicians for the patient. Lobbyists shamelessly portray the Canadian system in a negative light although I have yet to meet a Canadian who would be willing to adopt the American model. In fact, no country that has a public option would change to the American model for the simple reason that they know that a health care system based on profits would deny insurance to those who are most in need. According to the World Health Organization, the U.S. ranks low in two of three main categories associated with health care: preventive care and cost of care. It is true that in a couple of categories the U.S. excels, such as surgery and medical technology, but there are many other criteria for good health, especially in the area of preventive medicine. In France, whose general health care system is highly regarded throughout the world, providers satisfy the three categories: They provide easier access to medical facilities; life spans are longer; there is lower child mortality, and there is guaranteed health care from cradle to grave financed through tax revenues. The government’s role is to make sure that the whole population has access to care. It protects patients’ rights, helps to work out policy and is the responsible party where health safety is concerned. Despite this, it is not a single payer. America now pays out 17 percent of its gross national product on health while France, Canada and England pay less than 10 percent. The trillion-dollar additional cost that has been under discussion in Congress is based on a 10-year cycle that amounts to $200 billion per year. Compared to the trillion-dollar bailout of banking interests on Wall Street and the trillion-dollar war in Iraq and the continuing hemorrhaging of the auto industry, this is a reasonable amount. The real reason there are such vehement arguments over public options versus private plans does not involve which is superior but which approach has the most to lose. Large corporations, whether HMOs or pharmaceuticals, are intent on creating indecision and doubt in the minds of many Americans concerning universal health care. Most medical professionals, including the 3 million-member American Nursing Association and the American Medical Association, have endorsed health care plans with public options. But with all the lobbying taking place by corporate interests there is a real danger that the public option will be removed. This would be a major setback for both working and unemployed Americans. At this moment 14,000 people per day are losing their health care because of the current downturn in the economy. Democracy cannot long survive if the gaps between rich and poor continue to increase and continue shifting us toward a small wealthy minority and a disappearing middle class. Health care is the largest cause of bankruptcy among the elderly. It bleeds and depletes the resources of families even when one person suffers a serious accident or illness. Although we pay twice the amount per capita as do other developed countries, the results are that we are less healthy. Let us support a public option based on the common good. Hugh Curran of Surry is an adjunct professor in peace studies at the University of Maine. He previously was the director of a Down East homeless shelter.
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
My argument? Complete freedom of choice in health-care: Good. Socialized medicine: Bad. Bankrupt nation paying for socialized medicine: Even Worse.
2 :
You asked this question yesterday. My answer remains the same. Much of what the writer says is very true. The most important consideration ~~ at least as far as the health care providers are considered ~~ is "Profit" Health care to those who have invested in such is a "business" They don't' really care about a person's health. It's all based on who winds up with the potful of money. Read the article again. It's called 'greed'~~~ and He makes good sense.
3 :
No he doesn't...He is a Socialist Shill. A capitalist hater. Why in the world would someone invest 12 years of college to earn $80,000 a year? Also, does The O'Bama guarantee that a doctor won't get sued? Will a doctor no longer have to pay malpractice insurance? Democracy may not survive as this Educated imbecile is clamoring, But I guarantee you a Republican form of government (the form of government in the US, NOT a Democracy) HAS to have a gap between the rich and the poor or the poor will have NO incentive to better their situation. Also by removing wealth from the one who earns it and gives it to those who don't provides an incentive to do one of two things. STOP making money or go make it where it is NOT taken away from you...Since the latest tax increase in New York City, watch to see how many rich leave that mess and how many poor move in to fill the vacuum.
Read more discussion :
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
verage nurse salary in european countries
verage nurse salary in european countries ?
Maybe we can help to all those people who would like to consider about moving abroad with infos we have or we can find around on the internet,i made some list and entered numbers for the countries i know the average salary,maybe other people can join me and write numbers for other countries if they know something,also if countries provide more than 12th salaries per year Austria 1400-1500€ 13th and 14th salaries Belgium 1100-1400€ Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark France Germany Greece Italy 1200-1400€ 13th salary Ireland Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Russia Sweden Switzerland Spain Slovakia Slovenia 600-1000€ UK-England
Other - Local Businesses - 0 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Poland: 411-1150 Euro (depending on qualifications and hospital). Average paycheck: ca. 700 EU. Above average, considered "high" - in big cities ca. 1000 EU Average prices in big cities are higher or similar to the "old EU countries". Electronics, cosmetics, clothing, tabbaco, cars are higher then in for ex. Germany or France.
Read more discussion :
Maybe we can help to all those people who would like to consider about moving abroad with infos we have or we can find around on the internet,i made some list and entered numbers for the countries i know the average salary,maybe other people can join me and write numbers for other countries if they know something,also if countries provide more than 12th salaries per year Austria 1400-1500€ 13th and 14th salaries Belgium 1100-1400€ Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark France Germany Greece Italy 1200-1400€ 13th salary Ireland Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Russia Sweden Switzerland Spain Slovakia Slovenia 600-1000€ UK-England
Other - Local Businesses - 0 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Poland: 411-1150 Euro (depending on qualifications and hospital). Average paycheck: ca. 700 EU. Above average, considered "high" - in big cities ca. 1000 EU Average prices in big cities are higher or similar to the "old EU countries". Electronics, cosmetics, clothing, tabbaco, cars are higher then in for ex. Germany or France.
Read more discussion :
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)